Skip to main content

Handling of deviation

Handling of deviation 

Deviation:

Aviation are measured difference between observed value and expected or normal value for a process or product condition.
Why deviation occurs:     

GMP Mistakes or Error
  • Performing an activity without proper training.
  • Failure due to not following written SOPs,STP or approved batch record instruction.
  • Reprocessing or rework.
  • Unapproved changes.
Type of deviation: There are two type of deviation which is explained as:
  1. Planned deviation
  2. Unplanned deviation

Planned deviation:

  • Planned deviation, which are described, and pre approved deviation from the current operational document/system, covering a specified period of time or number of batches.
  • All changes should be evaluated for quality of product and yield of products.
  • The need for qualification or re-validation.
  • Change ultimately approved are rejected by quality assurance.
  • For quality improvement of products.
  • Use new instrument or new method parameter.
  • Maintenance as per schedule.
  • Break down/Shut down as per schedule.
  • For yield improvement of products.
Example:
  • Celebration or validation is not carried out of any instrument or equipment as per schedule due to delay for various reasons.
  • Change in batch size of any product.
  • Product release without complete results of quality control.

Unplanned deviation:

Any uncontrolled event in the form of the designed system or procedure at any stage of manufacturing, packaging, testing, holding and storage of drugs. It is defined as unplanned deviation. For example:
  • SOP & STP not fallow up.
  • Yield less or more against standard yield.
  • Expired standard and chemical use.
  • Not calibrated instrument use.
  • Instrument break down during analysis.

Example:
  • Any failure of utility (HVAC,Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning)
  • Any failure of parameter (fluctuations in Humidity or Temperature)
  • Any failure of equipment (sudden break down)

Category of deviation:

  1. Critical
  2. Major
  3. Minor

Critical deviation:

  • When cGMP has a significant effect and above quality also has a significant effect, it is placed in the category of critical deviation. OR 
  • It is also considered to be a critical deviation when there is a minor impact above the cGMP and a significant impact above the quality.
  • Such deviation requiring immediate action, investigation and documentation as such by the appropriate SOP
Example:
  • Expired are rejected chemical/Reagents/Standards used.
  • Cross contamination in product.

Major deviation:

  • When cGMP has a significant effect and quality has a miner effect, it is placed in the category of major deviation. 
  • Such deviation requiring immediate action, investigation and documentation as such by the appropriate SOP.
Example:

  • Use of unapproved reference/working standard.
  • Finished product analysis done on not calibrated instrument.
  •  Production started without line clearance.
  • Filter integrity test not performed.
  • Operational parameter out if range.

Miner deviation:

  • When cGMP has a miner effect and above quality also has a miner effect, it is placed in the category of miner deviation.
  • Such deviations treated as such by the applicable procedure.
Example:
  • Skip of FIFO (First in first out) principal.
  • Instrument break down during idle condition.
  • Labeling of instrument not done as per SOP.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To determine loss on drying (LOD)

To determine loss on drying (LOD) Definition:   Loss on drying compares the weight of product sample before and after drying. The result is the percentage of moisture in a product. % Moisture = (Begging weight-Ending weight) X 100                         -----------------------------------------------                                    Begging weight  Loss on drying determine by two method which is given below: Method (1):   Weigh accurately a dry empty glass Petri dish. Put the sample (about 0.5 to 5 gm as par requirement, Its mean if sample having less wet take 5 g weight. If sample having more wet than take 0.5 g weight ) in dish and weigh. Note down the reading. Distribute the sample in Petri dish by gentle shaking. Place the loaded dish (without cover) in the drying chamber for two hours. Maintain the oven temperature 105 +/- 5 0 C.  After drying is completed, open the drying chamber, cover the dish and allow it to cool at room temp.  Keep it in the desiccator for 15

IR स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी और इसका सिद्धांत

IR स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी और इसका सिद्धांत  IR स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी क्या है और इसका सिद्धांत क्या है? एक अणु या एक रासायनिक यौगिक में यह पता लगाने के लिए कि कौन से कार्यात्मक समूह या समूह मौजूद हैं, हम IR स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी तकनीक का उपयोग करते हैं। आईआर स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी तकनीक का प्रदर्शन करने के लिए हम विद्युत चुम्बकीय स्पेक्ट्रम की एक विशिष्ट श्रेणी का उपयोग करते हैं जिसे हम IR (इन्फ्रारेड) विकिरण कहते हैं आईआर विकिरण तरंग दैर्ध्य की विभिन्न श्रेणियों से बना है और IR विकिरण के इस अनुप्रयोग को IR स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी के रूप में जाना जाता है क्योंकि यह पहचानने के लिए कि सभी कार्यात्मक समूह मौजूद हो सकते हैं हम IR विकिरण का उपयोग करते हैं इसलिए जब हम किसी नमूने पर आईआर विकिरण लागू करते हैं, तो हम इस तकनीक को आईआर स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी कहते हैं  अब आइए नजर डालते हैं आईआर स्पेक्ट्रोस्कोपी के सिद्धांत पर   जिस किसी भी नमूना का हम विश्लेषण करना चाहते हैं (नमूना किसी भी रूप में हो सकता है - ठोस, तरल या गैस) हम उसका नमूना तैयार करते हैं और इसे आईआर स्पेक्ट्रोफोटोमीटर में डालते हैं IR स्पेक्ट्रोफोटोमीटर वह उपकरण है

Analytical Method Validation

Analytical Method Validation   The validation is performance, demonstration of any procedure, process, equipment, material, activity or any system performance as expected under given set of condition. In the most basis form, validation is proving that the performance is as intended. When extended to an analytical procedure,depending upon the application, it means that the method works reproducibaly, when carry out by same or different persons, in same or different laboratories, using different reagents, different equipment, etc. The analyst normally tends to assume that if an analytical method or process performs reproducibility in an limited number of experiment, it will continue doing so forever, which is too optimistic to assume. The Benefits:   The biggest   advantage  of method validation is that it builds a degree of confidence, not only for the developer but also to the user. Although the validation exercise may appears costly and time consuming. It is results in expens